School as Urban Infrastructure: From Educational Building to Multifunctional Centre
The modern school is increasingly no longer perceived as an isolated educational building. As noted by Andrey Kalinin, in the context of demographic divergence and the growing complexity of public infrastructure demands, it is becoming an integral part of a broader urban system. Today, the school functions not only as an educational facility, but also as a contributor to urban resilience, economic performance, and the quality of the built environment.
Demography as a Driver of Architectural Change
According to Andrey Kalinin, one of the primary drivers reshaping school infrastructure is demography. Some cities are experiencing population growth and a shortage of educational capacity, while others face declining student numbers and underused facilities. These opposing conditions are already redefining the school typology.
According to Andrey Kalinin, one of the primary drivers reshaping school infrastructure is demography. Some cities are experiencing population growth and a shortage of educational capacity, while others face declining student numbers and underused facilities. These opposing conditions are already redefining the school typology.
International practice demonstrates a growing spectrum of adaptive strategies. In regions experiencing population decline, school buildings are being repurposed into multifunctional civic centres, combining public space, cultural programming, and service infrastructure.
In several countries, including China, schools in areas with sustained demographic decline are being converted into elderly care and social support facilities. In such transformations, the corridor-based spatial structure of schools proves highly adaptable to a hospitality-like logic: classrooms become residential units, while shared areas are reconfigured as spaces for social interaction and daily life. The building retains its civic role, while its user profile shifts fundamentally.
In parallel, the reverse process is also emerging: large-span or open-plan structures — including former industrial and warehouse buildings — are being adapted into educational facilities. This allows cities to respond rapidly to increased demand for schools without the need for new capital construction.
In several countries, including China, schools in areas with sustained demographic decline are being converted into elderly care and social support facilities. In such transformations, the corridor-based spatial structure of schools proves highly adaptable to a hospitality-like logic: classrooms become residential units, while shared areas are reconfigured as spaces for social interaction and daily life. The building retains its civic role, while its user profile shifts fundamentally.
In parallel, the reverse process is also emerging: large-span or open-plan structures — including former industrial and warehouse buildings — are being adapted into educational facilities. This allows cities to respond rapidly to increased demand for schools without the need for new capital construction.
Hybrid School Models
Andrey Kalinin referenced a series of international precedents where educational buildings are deeply embedded in urban life. In the Netherlands, for example, the school “t’Karregat”, built in the mid-20th century, integrates a kindergarten, primary school, library, and retail functions within a single structure. According to him, such projects demonstrate that a school can simultaneously operate as a social, educational, and economic framework. Crucially, this is not a random accumulation of functions, but a carefully composed spatial system in which multiple programs coexist without conflict.
From Typology to Systems of Use
As emphasized by Andrey Kalinin, contemporary school design is gradually shifting away from fixed typologies toward systems defined by use scenarios.
He identifies several key spatial models:
Compact urban school
A dense architectural structure organized around external courtyards and clearly defined access points. This model enables tight integration into the urban fabric while maintaining clear separation of flows.
Andrey Kalinin referenced a series of international precedents where educational buildings are deeply embedded in urban life. In the Netherlands, for example, the school “t’Karregat”, built in the mid-20th century, integrates a kindergarten, primary school, library, and retail functions within a single structure. According to him, such projects demonstrate that a school can simultaneously operate as a social, educational, and economic framework. Crucially, this is not a random accumulation of functions, but a carefully composed spatial system in which multiple programs coexist without conflict.
From Typology to Systems of Use
As emphasized by Andrey Kalinin, contemporary school design is gradually shifting away from fixed typologies toward systems defined by use scenarios.
He identifies several key spatial models:
Compact urban school
A dense architectural structure organized around external courtyards and clearly defined access points. This model enables tight integration into the urban fabric while maintaining clear separation of flows.
Campus model
Programmatic functions are distributed across multiple buildings, offering operational flexibility and long-term adaptability in use and management.
Programmatic functions are distributed across multiple buildings, offering operational flexibility and long-term adaptability in use and management.
High-density urban school
Typical of central metropolitan contexts, where land scarcity drives vertical and compact configurations. In global practice, such schools may incorporate underground levels for parking and technical infrastructure — as seen in the Sant Martí School in Barcelona.
Typical of central metropolitan contexts, where land scarcity drives vertical and compact configurations. In global practice, such schools may incorporate underground levels for parking and technical infrastructure — as seen in the Sant Martí School in Barcelona.
Flow Architecture and Autonomous Systems
Using projects by akvk+partners as reference, Andrey Kalinin outlined key architectural instruments enabling hybrid modes of use:
Using projects by akvk+partners as reference, Andrey Kalinin outlined key architectural instruments enabling hybrid modes of use:
- Separation of flows — educational, sports, and public programs operate in parallel while engaging with external urban circulation
- Autonomous blocks — programmatic components can function independently within a larger system
- Public core — a library, co-working space, or theatre hall acting as a civic anchor
Economy and Operational Logic
A multifunctional model significantly increases the operational efficiency of school buildings. Facilities can extend their use beyond school hours into evenings and weekends, accommodate external audiences, and partially offset operational costs through shared programming.
Value for Developers and the City
This approach produces measurable urban and economic effects:
Reduced risk of underutilization
The building is not tied to a single programmatic scenario and can adapt to demographic and social change.
Increased project value
The school becomes an infrastructural asset rather than a regulatory obligation within residential or mixed-use developments.
Enhanced territorial attractiveness
Public-facing functions create destinations and improve the overall quality of the urban environment.
Additional economic potential
Selected functions — cultural, sports, and civic — can operate as semi-independent services.
Value for the Community
Andrey Kalinin emphasized that within this model, the school becomes not only an infrastructural element, but also a social core of the neighbourhood:
Constraints and Strategic Entry Point
One of the primary constraints remains the regulatory framework, which defines strict parameters for land use, program allocation, and building typologies. As Andrey Kalinin notes, the most critical decisions are therefore made at the master planning stage, where the school’s role within the urban structure, circulation logic, and potential use scenarios are established.
Conclusion
The school of the future is a flexible spatial system capable of operating across multiple roles — educational, social, cultural, and civic — depending on context. Architecture, in synergy with planning and governance, determines whether the school remains a closed institutional object or evolves into an active component of urban life.
A multifunctional model significantly increases the operational efficiency of school buildings. Facilities can extend their use beyond school hours into evenings and weekends, accommodate external audiences, and partially offset operational costs through shared programming.
Value for Developers and the City
This approach produces measurable urban and economic effects:
Reduced risk of underutilization
The building is not tied to a single programmatic scenario and can adapt to demographic and social change.
Increased project value
The school becomes an infrastructural asset rather than a regulatory obligation within residential or mixed-use developments.
Enhanced territorial attractiveness
Public-facing functions create destinations and improve the overall quality of the urban environment.
Additional economic potential
Selected functions — cultural, sports, and civic — can operate as semi-independent services.
Value for the Community
Andrey Kalinin emphasized that within this model, the school becomes not only an infrastructural element, but also a social core of the neighbourhood:
- Formation of local community — a shared environment for interaction across age groups
- Access to quality space — cultural, sports, and educational facilities beyond school hours
- Continuous activation — constant use increases safety and urban vitality
- Intergenerational exchange — overlapping programs foster social resilience
- Identity of place — the school becomes embedded in everyday urban life and shapes district character
Constraints and Strategic Entry Point
One of the primary constraints remains the regulatory framework, which defines strict parameters for land use, program allocation, and building typologies. As Andrey Kalinin notes, the most critical decisions are therefore made at the master planning stage, where the school’s role within the urban structure, circulation logic, and potential use scenarios are established.
Conclusion
The school of the future is a flexible spatial system capable of operating across multiple roles — educational, social, cultural, and civic — depending on context. Architecture, in synergy with planning and governance, determines whether the school remains a closed institutional object or evolves into an active component of urban life.
akvk+partners — creating architectural history
35, 1-ya Brestskaya Street, Moscow
© 2010–2026
